<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>World Press Photo, Repetition</title>
		<description>Comments for World Press Photo, Repetition at http://www.foto8.com/home , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.foto8.com/home</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:42:18 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.foto8.com/home/content/view/381/31/#comment-38</link>
			<description>Excellent and thoughtful essay! I agree completely and have often urged and argued (in print and through imagery) that our relationship to &quot;document\&quot; and &quot;photojournalism&quot; needs to evolve, or rather, to excavate. That many photographers and many editors and many arbiters see use an old paradigmn to harness their references is often disheartening at best, borish at worst. 

.......

cheers
bob
 - Bob Black</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:35:57 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.foto8.com/home/content/view/381/31/#comment-36</link>
			<description>Repetition may not be new to photography, but when it comes to photojournalism surely it IS new - a cry for attention to a world that increasingly relegates the still image to the realms of art rather than reportage. Art can do what it likes, but reportage, surely, is linear; adding repetition to it is to turn it into a form of (maybe - big maybe) artistic comment. But journalism it ain't (though possibly none the worse for that)! - Nick</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:44:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
