| Review of the Diana F+ |
|
|
| 19 Aug 2008 | |
|
The Diana F+ is the latest medium format camera from Lomography – an affectionate remake of the dirt-cheap but commercially unsuccessful 1960s original from Hong Kong. It is a very good looking camera with a retro bulb flash, cast in reflective silver, standing proudly on top of the matt plastic casing. I am a big fan of the Holga – Diana’s well-established big brother and I was eager to test out the Diana F+ over the summer. The results were certainly unpredictable as the team at Lomography proudly predict! I used transparency film which was developed normally and the colours, particularly blues, are so saturated the frames look cross processed. Unfortunately some shots didn’t come out at all due to a gaping light leak. I’m wondering now whether I may have forgotten to flip from the Diana’s unlimited exposure mode back to normal daytime mode whilst shooting in an elusive period of London sunshine?! There’s quite a lot to remember…
Unlike the Holga, which is available with a glass lens and can produce some very sharp images, the Diana’s lens is plastic and this is evident in many of my photos which made me rub my eyes in an attempt to refocus! The soft 70s blurring effect is a heralded feature of the Diana which many adore but, personally, I find it a little frustrating and regard these photos as failures. However, the small percentage of shots that did come out and are in focus have the depth of field, intense colour and ethereal quality that I have come to love in Holga images. I think my problem with the Diana is that, unlike the Holga, it doesn’t cater as much to my inner perfectionist. It is intended to be more of an instrument for photographic impulse rather than carefully composed compositions. The Lomographic society are quite clear about their feelings towards perfectionism:
Set as favorite
Comments (2)
![]()
...
written by vstephanie, September 02, 2008
yay im so glad you guys have set up a competition to appreciate the oh so wonderful diana. i have a diana f and she does wonders. since i live in bali it is hard to develop medium format films so i also purchased a separate 35mm back from the guys at lomography.com so now i can shoot and develop my film anywhere with ease. however its more of a guessing game to shoot with the 35mm because the image is half as tall and less wide than the view finder so its harder than shooting with a 120mm. i suggest whatever film you shoot with the diana, always keep your subject in the middle of the viewfinder and at a safe focal distance of 3-4m because as your focus closer, the focus rings moves out so the photo turns out like a macro. so it doesnt matter how far you are from your subject, its about how much of the subject you want in the picture and if you dont get this right, you will have offset pictures which can look cool but for the most part really sucks if you wanted to display the whole subject. also, dont always shoot according to the weather condition. if its really sunny, shoot partially cloudy to get a darker and more saturated effect. as for the light leaking, that's the beauty of the diana and if you want to prevent this make sure you wind the film straight away after you shoot a photo, if not use a black tape or just really try to appreciate all that beautiful light leaking in. anyway i uploaded my 35mm shots to foto8 flicker on vstephanie87. cheers
... written by Joe www.pinkpoliceman.co.uk, August 21, 2008
I have an original Diana and after shooting a couple of rolls there was only really one 'good' result. In fact it was pretty much the only result. Compared to the Holga the original Diana has so far had a much lower success rate. But I do love the look and feel of it, couldn't be more cheap.
Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|






